sirbombalot asked: Would you rather be put to death by the death penalty, knowing that you'd totally get to chill with Jesus in Heaven and play Contra all day, BUT he has no snacks at his place, you have to be P2, and you're always on fire and can FEEL the burn, though it doesn't hurt THAT much, or be set free from the death sentence, but every food you eat for the rest of your life tastes like black licorice?
My gut reaction is the second option because I don’t have to die. However, let’s talk it through.
Being put to death by execution has got to be traumatic. Clearly I’ve done something terrible to someone somewhere and now I’m paying for my crimes. Simply put: I don’t want to die. However, realizing that there actually is a heaven and a Jesus, though completely counter to my actual beliefs, would be really interesting to experience. But that’s where it gets tricky. If I’m getting the death penalty, then I’ve done something wrong, right? I mean, what are the chances that my execution is going forward with no justification? Why would I be going to heaven? Does everyone get into heaven? Are Hitler and Stalin going to be there too? Will they be playing NARC as I play Contra (Hitler obviously taking the player 2 controller so that he doesn’t get to drive the red car in the later levels)? That brings me to the Contra ordeal. Here’s the thing: I wasn’t a big fan of Contra. I don’t think it’s the best example of a 2D action game from that era. I didn’t enjoy it when I was young, I don’t enjoy it as an adult. Playing Contra, regardless of which player controller I take up, would be boring for me. Since we’re dealing with an afterlife, by the way, it is implied that I’ll be doing these things for eternity. That’s far too long to do any one thing. Plus, I’d have to deal with me not thinking what I was experiencing was even possible during my physical life. That kind of cognitive dissonance would haunt me for far too long for me to enjoy eternity. Essentially, in this scenario, my sense of reality, video game selection, and desired length of time per activity have all been absolutely shattered. This is not ideal.
The second option has me not being dead, a scenario I much prefer already. My philosophy of life is as follows: don’t die. This scenario is much more in accordance to my life-goals than the last. However, I do enjoy food, as every human who has ever existed has. Food is an integral part of culture. Culture, in many respects, helps shape identity. Therefore, food can be an important part of who you are. However, as important as food is to life, having only one flavor from which to choose would certainly have its benefits. For example, I could just eat healthy foods for the rest of my life. My nutritional intake could be constructed to fit that of a perfectly balanced and healthy lifestyle. With that considered, my life expectancy, something I obviously covet in this scenario since I don’t want to die, would dramatically increase. That being said… I sure would miss those Reese’s Easter egg candies…
Anyway…
I would definitely go with the not dying but everything tasting like licorice scenario. Sure, I’d have a bland life of boring food, but at least I would be super healthy and not dead. Dealing with eternity in the other scenario is just too much for me.












